There are many wonderful people in my life who made writing this thesis possible.
First and foremost, I have to thank my supervisor, Hugo Mercier. Without Hugo, I would never have been able to write this thesis—nor would I have started any thesis in the first place. When he agreed to supervise me as an intern during my Master’s, I was completely new to cognitive science and completely clueless. What followed were one and a half years of failed experiments on a topic we never returned to. And yet, somehow, Hugo made this experience fun and intellectually stimulating. More than that, he gave me the feeling that my thoughts mattered. Hugo always made time for me, whether in weekly meetings or within-the-minute replies to my emails. I would never have imagined myself as a researcher if it weren’t for Hugo’s kindness, generosity, and encouragement. I still have a lot to learn from him, and I hope we’ll have many opportunities to keep working together in the future.
I thank Sacha Altay, who is not only a friend but has also been an academic mentor to me. Sacha’s down-to-earth attitude while producing great research is a constant inspiration. He also taught me to be more pragmatic (though I still have a long way to go).
I’ve been fortunate to be part of a team of brilliant and kind people at the Institut Jean Nicod. I couldn’t have hoped for a more intellectually stimulating place to grow up, academically speaking. I’m grateful for the fun conversations, the valuable feedback, and the delicious pizza after lab meetings. In particular, I’d like to thank my co-authors Benoît, Sophie, and Lou for their excellent collaboration. I also have to single out Coralie Chevalier, who’s class on psychology and public policy first inspired me to apply for a Master’s in Cognitive Science. I’m also grateful for her trust in giving me the opportunity to design and teach my own course.
Thanks to Lilas, for being a great friend, faithful lunch companion, and making sure I didn’t miss countless administrative requirements and deadlines.
I was incredibly lucky to have made many friends in Paris who helped take my mind off research when needed, in particular Amelie, Elie, Edgar, Simon and Fiona. I also want to thank all the amazing people I was lucky enough to play music with–Adrian, Daniel, Enora, Luis, Bella, Chippy, Kenta, Malin, Michael, Octave, Rémy, Pablo, Marina, Reynaldo. These sessions and concerts always lifted me up, no matter how frustrating the day had been.
The two people who made Paris feel like home are my flatmates, Enara and Adrian. I owe much of my sanity and my sense of belonging in Paris to them. Lazy TV nights with ice cream-induced stomachaches or concerts in squads–with them, any plan is a good plan. Over the last couple of years, I’ve spent more time with Adrian than with anyone else, and I’ve cherished every single moment. This is what I will most miss about Paris.
There are other friends who, despite the distance, are always present in my life. Leon, Pauli, Jonas, Luis, Jakob, Chris, Eva, and Basti have been around for as long as I can remember, and they mean the world to me. There are also my dear friends Joseph and Sylvie who I wish I would see more often.
I would like to thank my parents, who love me and always trust me to do the right thing. Neither of them got a university degree, yet they unconditionally supported me through all those years of education. I thank my dad, Thorsten, who always inspired me to think critically. I look up to him for his unshakable optimism and stamina. I thank my mum, Katja, for putting me on the right track in so many ways: for making me learn an instrument, for the countless hours she spent reading to me as a child, for helping me study vocabulary, for running a household with four kids while working. I’m incredibly grateful to have my siblings Luca, Jona, and Franca in my life, and for the moments of laughter and empathy we share whenever we’re all home together.
Thanks to my grandma, Oma Brunhilde, for being living proof that people who occasionally distrust science can be the loveliest people. Thanks to Opa Erwin, for always taking care of us. And to Oma Renate and to Opa Horst, who never got tired of sharing his passion for history with me and would probably have been the single most proud person to see me finish a dissertation.
I was fortunate enough to have been adopted by a second family in Spain. I thank Consu and Miguel for their endless generosity and for giving me a sense of calm I’ve never experienced anywhere else. Thanks to Maria and Dani for always supporting me.
I owe special thanks to Carmen, for never getting tired of showing me all that is beautiful in life. I may have found more insight in the novels that she has offered me over the years than I could ever find in research.
*Ali, Khudejah, Cong Li, Khawaja Zain-ul-abdin, and Muhammad Adeel Zaffar. 2022. “Fake News on Facebook: Examining the Impact of Heuristic Cues on Perceived Credibility and Sharing Intention.” Internet Research 32 (1): 379–97.
Allen, Jennifer, Antonio A. Arechar, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2021. “Scaling up Fact-Checking Using the Wisdom of Crowds.” Science Advances 7 (36): eabf4393.
*Altay, Sacha, Andrea De Angelis, and Emma Hoes. 2024.
“Media Literacy Tips Promoting Reliable News Improve Discernment and Enhance Trust in Traditional Media.” Communications Psychology 2 (1): 1–9.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00121-5.
*Altay, Sacha, and Fabrizio Gilardi. n.d.
“People Are Skeptical of Headlines Labeled as AI-Generated, Even If True or Human-Made, Because They Assume Full AI Automation.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/83k9r.
*Altay, Sacha, Benjamin A. Lyons, and Ariana Modirrousta-Galian. 2024.
“Exposure to Higher Rates of False News Erodes Media Trust and Fuels Overconfidence.” Mass Communication and Society, August, 1–25.
https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2382776.
*Altay, Sacha, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, and Richard Fletcher. 2022.
“The Impact of News Media and Digital Platform Use on Awareness of and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7tm3s.
Altay, Sacha, Emma de Araujo, and Hugo Mercier. 2022.
““If This Account Is True, It Is Most Enormously Wonderful”: Interestingness-If-True and the Sharing of True and False News.” Digital Journalism 10 (3): 373–94.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163.
*Arechar, Antonio A., Jennifer Allen, Adam J. Berinsky, Rocky Cole, Ziv Epstein, Kiran Garimella, Andrew Gully, et al. 2023.
“Understanding and Combatting Misinformation Across 16 Countries on Six Continents.” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (9): 1502–13.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6.
*Arin, K. Peren, Deni Mazrekaj, and Marcel Thum. 2023.
“Ability of Detecting and Willingness to Share Fake News.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 7298.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34402-6.
Aslett, Kevin, Zeve Sanderson, William Godel, Nathaniel Persily, Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2024.
“Online Searches to Evaluate Misinformation Can Increase Its Perceived Veracity.” Nature 625 (7995): 548–56.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y.
*Badrinathan, Sumitra. 2021.
“Educative Interventions to Combat Misinformation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in India.” American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1325–41.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000459.
*Bago, Bence, David G. Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2020.
“Fake News, Fast and Slow: Deliberation Reduces Belief in False (but Not True) News Headlines.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 149 (8): 1608–13.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729.
*Bago, Bence, Leah R. Rosenzweig, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand. 2022.
“Emotion May Predict Susceptibility to Fake News but Emotion Regulation Does Not Seem to Help.” Cognition and Emotion, June, 1–15.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2090318.
*Basol, Melisa, Jon Roozenbeek, Manon Berriche, Fatih Uenal, William P. McClanahan, and Sander van der Linden. 2021.
“Towards Psychological Herd Immunity: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Two Prebunking Interventions Against COVID-19 Misinformation.” Big Data & Society 8 (1): 205395172110138.
https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868.
*Brashier, Nadia M., Gordon Pennycook, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand. 2021.
“Timing Matters When Correcting Fake News.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (5): e2020043118.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118.
*Bronstein, Michael V., Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, David G. Rand, and Tyrone D. Cannon. 2019.
“Belief in Fake News Is Associated with Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic Thinking.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 8 (1): 108–17.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005.
Bryanov, Kirill, Reinhold Kliegl, Olessia Koltsova, Alex Miltsov, Sergei Pashakhin, Alexander Porshnev, Yadviga Sinyavskaya, Maksim Terpilovskii, and Victoria Vziatysheva. 2023.
“What Drives Perceptions of Foreign News Coverage Credibility? A Cross-National Experiment Including Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.” Political Communication 40 (2): 115–46.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2172492.
Chen, Xi, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. 2023. “What Makes News Sharable on Social Media?” Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital Media 3.
*Clayton, Katherine, Spencer Blair, Jonathan A. Busam, Samuel Forstner, John Glance, Guy Green, Anna Kawata, et al. 2020.
“Real Solutions for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social Media.” Political Behavior 42 (4): 1073–95.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0.
Clemm Von Hohenberg, Bernhard. 2023.
“Truth and Bias, Left and Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News Supply.” Public Opinion Quarterly 87 (2): 267–92.
https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad013.
Dias, Nicholas, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Emphasizing Publishers Does Not Effectively Reduce Susceptibility to Misinformation on Social Media.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, January.
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001.
Epstein, Ziv, Nathaniel Sirlin, Antonio Arechar, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. 2023. “The Social Media Context Interferes with Truth Discernment.” Science Advances 9 (9): eabo6169.
*Erlich, Aaron, and Calvin Garner. 2023.
“Is Pro-Kremlin Disinformation Effective? Evidence from Ukraine.” The International Journal of Press/Politics 28 (1): 5–28.
https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221.
*Faragó, Laura, Péter Krekó, and Gábor Orosz. 2023.
“Hungarian, Lazy, and Biased: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Partisanship in Fake News Discernment on a Hungarian Representative Sample.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 178.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26724-8.
*Fazio, Lisa, David Rand, Stephan Lewandowsky, Mark Susmann, Adam J. Berinsky, Andrew Guess, Panayiota Kendeou, et al. n.d.
“Combating Misinformation: A Megastudy of Nine Interventions Designed to Reduce the Sharing of and Belief in False and Misleading Headlines.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uyjha.
Garrett, R. Kelly, and Robert M. Bond. 2021.
“Conservatives’ Susceptibility to Political Misperceptions.” Science Advances 7 (23): eabf1234.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234.
Gawronski, Bertram, Nyx L. Ng, and Dillon M. Luke. 2023.
“Truth Sensitivity and Partisan Bias in Responses to Misinformation.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 152 (8): 2205–36.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001381.
*Gottlieb, Jessica, Claire Adida, and Richard Moussa. n.d.
“Reducing Misinformation in a Polarized Context: Experimental Evidence from Côte d’ivoire.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6x4wy.
*Guess, Andrew M., Michael Lerner, Benjamin Lyons, Jacob M. Montgomery, Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler, and Neelanjan Sircar. 2020.
“A Digital Media Literacy Intervention Increases Discernment Between Mainstream and False News in the United States and India.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (27): 15536–45.
https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117.
*Hameleers, Michael, Marina Tulin, Claes De Vreese, Toril Aalberg, Peter Van Aelst, Ana Sofia Cardenal, Nicoleta Corbu, et al. 2023.
“Mistakenly Misinformed or Intentionally Deceived? Mis- and Disinformation Perceptions on the Russian War in Ukraine Among Citizens in 19 Countries.” European Journal of Political Research, December, 1475–6765.12646.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12646.
*Hlatky, Roman. n.d.
“Unintended Consequences? Russian Disinformation and Public Opinion.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/85vmt.
*Koetke, Jonah, Karina Schumann, Tenelle Porter, and Ilse Smilo-Morgan. 2023.
“Fallibility Salience Increases Intellectual Humility: Implications for People’s Willingness to Investigate Political Misinformation.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 49 (5): 806–20.
https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221080979.
*Kreps, Sarah E., and Douglas L. Kriner. 2023.
“Assessing Misinformation Recall and Accuracy Perceptions: Evidence from the COVID-19 Pandemic.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, October.
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-123.
*Lee, Eun-Ju, and Jeong-woo Jang. 2023.
“How Political Identity and Misinformation Priming Affect Truth Judgments and Sharing Intention of Partisan News.” Digital Journalism 0 (0): 1–20.
https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2163413.
*Lühring, Jula, Apeksha Shetty, Corinna Koschmieder, David Garcia, Annie Waldherr, and Hannah Metzler. n.d.
“Emotions in Misinformation Studies: Distinguishing Affective State from Emotional Response and Misinformation Recognition from Acceptance.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/udqms.
Luo, Mufan, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and David M. Markowitz. 2022.
“Credibility Perceptions and Detection Accuracy of Fake News Headlines on Social Media: Effects of Truth-Bias and Endorsement Cues.” Communication Research 49 (2): 171–95.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921321.
*Lutzke, Lauren, Caitlin Drummond, Paul Slovic, and Joseph Árvai. 2019.
“Priming Critical Thinking: Simple Interventions Limit the Influence of Fake News about Climate Change on Facebook.” Global Environmental Change 58 (September): 101964.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Andy J. King, and Kimberly Kaphingst. n.d.
“A Health Media Literacy Intervention Increases Skepticism of Both Inaccurate and Accurate Cancer News Among U.S. Adults.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hm9ty.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Ariana Modirrousta-Galian, Sacha Altay, and Nikita Antonia Salovich. 2024.
“Reduce Blind Spots to Improve News Discernment? Performance Feedback Reduces Overconfidence but Does Not Improve Subsequent Discernment,” February.
https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kgfrb.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Jacob Montgomery, and Jason Reifler. n.d.
“Partisanship and Older Americans’ Engagement with Dubious Political News.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/etb89.
*Maertens, Rakoen, Friedrich M. Götz, Hudson F. Golino, Jon Roozenbeek, Claudia R. Schneider, Yara Kyrychenko, John R. Kerr, et al. 2024.
“The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A Psychometrically Validated Measure of News Veracity Discernment.” Behavior Research Methods 56 (3): 1863–99.
https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02124-2.
Mairal, Santos *Espina, Florencia Bustos, Guillermo Solovey, and Joaquín Navajas. 2023.
“Interactive Crowdsourcing to Fact-Check Politicians.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, August.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000492.
*Martel, Cameron, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Reliance on Emotion Promotes Belief in Fake News.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 5 (1): 47.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
*Modirrousta-Galian, Ariana, Philip A. Higham, and Tina Seabrooke. 2023.
“Effects of Inductive Learning and Gamification on News Veracity Discernment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 29 (3): 599–619.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000458.
———. 2024. “Wordless Wisdom: The Dominant Role of Tacit Knowledge in True and Fake News Discrimination.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition.
*Muda, Rafał, Gordon Pennycook, Damian Hamerski, and Michał Białek. 2023.
“People Are Worse at Detecting Fake News in Their Foreign Language.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 29 (4): 712–24.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000475.
*OECD. 2022.
“An International Effort Using Behavioural Science to Tackle the Spread of Misinformation.” https://doi.org/10.1787/b7709d4f-en.
*Orosz, Gábor, Benedek Paskuj, Laura Faragó, and Péter Krekó. 2023.
“A Prosocial Fake News Intervention with Durable Effects.” Scientific Reports 13 (1): 3958.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30867-7.
*Pehlivanoglu, Didem, Tian Lin, Farha Deceus, Amber Heemskerk, Natalie C. Ebner, and Brian S. Cahill. 2021.
“The Role of Analytical Reasoning and Source Credibility on the Evaluation of Real and Fake Full-Length News Articles.” Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 6 (1): 24.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00292-3.
*Pennycook, Gordon, Tyrone D. Cannon, and David G. Rand. 2018.
“Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 (12): 1865–80.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465.
*Pennycook, Gordon, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, Jackson G. Lu, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge Intervention.” Psychological Science 31 (7): 770–80.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054.
*Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Who Falls for Fake News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and Analytic Thinking.” Journal of Personality 88 (2): 185–200.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476.
Pennycook, Gordon, Jabin Binnendyk, Christie Newton, and David G. Rand. 2021.
“A Practical Guide to Doing Behavioral Research on Fake News and Misinformation.” Collabra: Psychology 7 (1): 25293.
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.25293.
Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. 2019.
“Lazy, Not Biased: Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning.” Cognition 188 (July): 39–50.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011.
*Pereira, Frederico Batista, Natália S. Bueno, Felipe Nunes, and Nara Pavão. 2023.
“Inoculation Reduces Misinformation: Experimental Evidence from Multidimensional Interventions in Brazil.” Journal of Experimental Political Science, July, 1–12.
https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2023.11.
*Rathje, Steve, Jon Roozenbeek, Jay J. Van Bavel, and Sander Van Der Linden. 2023.
“Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of (Mis)information.” Nature Human Behaviour, March.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w.
*Roozenbeek, Jon, Rakoen Maertens, Stefan M Herzog, Michael Geers, Ralf Kurvers, and Mubashir Sultan. 2022. “Susceptibility to Misinformation Is Consistent Across Question Framings and Response Modes and Better Explained by Myside Bias and Partisanship Than Analytical Thinking.” Judgment and Decision Making 17 (3): 27.
Roozenbeek, Jon, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, John Kerr, Alexandra L. J. Freeman, Gabriel Recchia, Anne Marthe van der Bles, and Sander van der Linden. 2020.
“Susceptibility to Misinformation about COVID-19 Around the World.” Royal Society Open Science 7 (10): 201199.
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199.
*Rosenzweig, Leah R., Bence Bago, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand. 2021.
“Happiness and Surprise Are Associated with Worse Truth Discernment of COVID-19 Headlines Among Social Media Users in Nigeria.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, August.
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-75.
*Ross, Björn, Jennifer Heisel, Anna-Katharina Jung, and Stefan Stieglitz. 2018. “Fake News on Social Media: The (In)Effectiveness of Warning Messages.”
*Ross, Robert M, David G Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2021. “Beyond “Fake News”: Analytic Thinking and the Detection of False and Hyperpartisan News Headlines.” Judgment and Decision Making 16 (2): 22.
Shirikov, Anton. 2024.
“Fake News for All: How Citizens Discern Disinformation in Autocracies.” Political Communication 41 (1): 4565.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2257618.
*Smelter, Thomas J., and Dustin P. Calvillo. 2020.
“Pictures and Repeated Exposure Increase Perceived Accuracy of News Headlines.” Applied Cognitive Psychology 34 (5): 1061–71.
https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3684.
*Stagnaro, Michael, Sophia Pink, David G. Rand, and Robb Willer. 2023.
“Increasing Accuracy Motivations Using Moral Reframing Does Not Reduce Republicans’ Belief in False News.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, November.
https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-128.
*Sultan, Mubashir, Alan N. Tump, Michael Geers, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen, Stefan M. Herzog, and Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers. 2022.
“Time Pressure Reduces Misinformation Discrimination Ability but Does Not Alter Response Bias.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 22416.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26209-8.
*Winter, Stephan, Sebastián Valenzuela, Marcelo Luis Barbosa Santos, Tobias Schreyer, Lena Iwertowski, and Tobias Rothmund. n.d.
“(Don’t) Stop Believing: A Signal Detection Approach to Risk and Protective Factors for Engagement with Politicized (Mis)information in Social Media.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/84c36.