References
Note
References preceeded by a ’*’ are studies included in the meta-analysis
Acerbi, Alberto, Sacha Altay, and Hugo Mercier. 2022. “Research
Note: Fighting Misinformation or Fighting for Information?”
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, January. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-87.
Achterberg, Peter, Willem De Koster, and Jeroen Van Der Waal. 2017.
“A Science Confidence Gap: Education, Trust in Scientific Methods,
and Trust in Scientific Institutions in the United States, 2014.”
Public Understanding of Science 26 (6): 704–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662515617367.
Agadjanian, Alexander, Jacob Cruger, Sydney House, Annie Huang, Noah
Kanter, Celeste Kearney, Junghye Kim, Isabelle Leonaitis, Sarah Petroni,
and Leonardo Placeres. 2023. “A Platform Penalty for News? How
Social Media Context Can Alter Information Credibility Online.”
Journal of Information Technology & Politics 20 (3):
338–48.
Algan, Yann, Daniel Cohen, Eva Davoine, Martial Foucault, and Stefanie
Stantcheva. 2021. “Trust in Scientists in Times of Pandemic: Panel
Evidence from 12 Countries.” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 118 (40): e2108576118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2108576118.
*Ali, Khudejah, Cong Li, Khawaja Zain-ul-abdin, and Muhammad Adeel
Zaffar. 2022. “Fake News on Facebook: Examining the Impact of
Heuristic Cues on Perceived Credibility and Sharing Intention.”
Internet Research 32 (1): 379–97.
Allen, Jennifer, Antonio A. Arechar, Gordon Pennycook, and David G.
Rand. 2021. “Scaling up Fact-Checking Using the Wisdom of
Crowds.” Science Advances 7 (36): eabf4393.
Allen, Jennifer, Baird Howland, Markus Mobius, David Rothschild, and
Duncan J. Watts. 2020. “Evaluating the Fake News Problem at the
Scale of the Information Ecosystem.” Science Advances 6
(14): eaay3539.
Allum, Nick, Patrick Sturgis, Dimitra Tabourazi, and Ian Brunton-Smith.
2008. “Science Knowledge and Attitudes Across Cultures: A
Meta-Analysis.” Public Understanding of Science 17 (1):
35–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506070159.
Alper, Sinan. n.d. “When Conspiracy Theories Make Sense: The Role
of Social Inclusiveness.”
*Altay, Sacha, Andrea De Angelis, and Emma Hoes. 2024. “Media
Literacy Tips Promoting Reliable News Improve Discernment and Enhance
Trust in Traditional Media.” Communications Psychology 2
(1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44271-024-00121-5.
*Altay, Sacha, and Fabrizio Gilardi. n.d. “People Are Skeptical of
Headlines Labeled as AI-Generated, Even If True or Human-Made, Because
They Assume Full AI Automation.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/83k9r.
*Altay, Sacha, Benjamin A. Lyons, and Ariana Modirrousta-Galian. 2024.
“Exposure to Higher Rates of False News Erodes Media Trust and
Fuels Overconfidence.” Mass Communication and Society,
August, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2024.2382776.
*Altay, Sacha, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, and Richard Fletcher. 2022.
“The Impact of News Media and Digital Platform Use on Awareness of
and Belief in COVID-19 Misinformation.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/7tm3s.
Altay, Sacha, Emma de Araujo, and Hugo Mercier. 2022.
““If This Account Is True, It Is Most Enormously
Wonderful”: Interestingness-If-True and the Sharing of True
and False News.” Digital Journalism 10 (3): 373–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1941163.
Altay, Sacha, Manon Berriche, and Alberto Acerbi. n.d.
“Misinformation on Misinformation: Conceptual and Methodological
Challenges.” Social Media.
Altay, Sacha, Andrea De Angelis, and Emma Hoes. n.d. “Beyond
Skepticism: Framing Media Literacy Tips to Promote Reliable
Informatio.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/5gckb.
Altay, Sacha, Richard Fletcher, and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2024.
“News Participation Is Declining: Evidence from 46 Countries
Between 2015 and 2022.” New Media & Society, May,
14614448241247822. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241247822.
Altay, Sacha, Anne-Sophie Hacquin, and Hugo Mercier. 2022. “Why Do
so Few People Share Fake News? It Hurts Their Reputation.”
New Media & Society 24 (6): 1303–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820969893.
Altay, Sacha, Rasmus Kleis Nielsen, and Richard Fletcher. 2022.
“Quantifying the “Infodemic”: People
Turned to Trustworthy News Outlets During the 2020 Coronavirus
Pandemic.” Journal of Quantitative Description: Digital
Media 2 (August). https://doi.org/10.51685/jqd.2022.020.
Altay, Sacha, Benjamin Lyons, and Ariana Modirrousta-Galian. n.d.
“Exposure to Higher Rates of False News Erodes Media Trust and
Fuels Skepticism in News Judgment.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/t9r43.
Altay, Sacha, Kenzo Nera, Waqas Ejaz, Céline Schöpfer, and Frédéric
Tomas. 2023. “Conspiracy Believers Claim to Be Free Thinkers but
(Under)Use Advice Like Everyone Else.” British Journal of
Social Psychology 62 (4): 1782–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12655.
Altenmüller, Marlene S., Tobias Wingen, and Anna Schulte. 2024.
“Explaining Polarized Trust in Scientists: A Political
Stereotype-Approach.” Science Communication 46 (1):
92–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/10755470231221770.
*Arechar, Antonio A., Jennifer Allen, Adam J. Berinsky, Rocky Cole, Ziv
Epstein, Kiran Garimella, Andrew Gully, et al. 2023.
“Understanding and Combatting Misinformation Across 16 Countries
on Six Continents.” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (9):
1502–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01641-6.
*Arin, K. Peren, Deni Mazrekaj, and Marcel Thum. 2023. “Ability of
Detecting and Willingness to Share Fake News.” Scientific
Reports 13 (1): 7298. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-34402-6.
Asch, Solomon E. 1956. “Studies of Independence and Conformity: I.
A Minority of One Against a Unanimous Majority.”
Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 70 (9): 1–70. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0093718.
Aslett, Kevin, Zeve Sanderson, William Godel, Nathaniel Persily,
Jonathan Nagler, and Joshua A. Tucker. 2024. “Online Searches to
Evaluate Misinformation Can Increase Its Perceived Veracity.”
Nature 625 (7995): 548–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06883-y.
Bachmann, Ingrid, and Sebastián Valenzuela. 2023. “Studying the
Downstream Effects of Fact-Checking on Social Media: Experiments on
Correction Formats, Belief Accuracy, and Media Trust.” Social
Media + Society 9 (2): 20563051231179694. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051231179694.
*Badrinathan, Sumitra. 2021. “Educative Interventions to Combat
Misinformation: Evidence from a Field Experiment in India.”
American Political Science Review 115 (4): 1325–41. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421000459.
*Bago, Bence, David G. Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2020. “Fake
News, Fast and Slow: Deliberation Reduces Belief in False (but Not True)
News Headlines.” Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General 149 (8): 1608–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729.
*Bago, Bence, Leah R. Rosenzweig, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand.
2022. “Emotion May Predict Susceptibility to Fake News but Emotion
Regulation Does Not Seem to Help.” Cognition and
Emotion, June, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2022.2090318.
Bak, Hee-Je. 2001. “Education and Public Attitudes Toward Science:
Implications for the “Deficit Model” of
Education and Support for Science and Technology.” Social
Science Quarterly 82 (4): 779–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00059.
Baptista, João Pedro, Elisete Correia, Anabela Gradim, and Valeriano
Piñeiro-Naval. 2021. “The Influence of Political Ideology on Fake
News Belief: The Portuguese Case.” Publications 9 (2):
23. https://doi.org/10.3390/publications9020023.
*Basol, Melisa, Jon Roozenbeek, Manon Berriche, Fatih Uenal, William P.
McClanahan, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. “Towards
Psychological Herd Immunity: Cross-Cultural Evidence for Two Prebunking
Interventions Against COVID-19 Misinformation.” Big Data
& Society 8 (1): 205395172110138. https://doi.org/10.1177/20539517211013868.
Batailler, Cédric, Skylar M. Brannon, Paul E. Teas, and Bertram
Gawronski. 2022. “A Signal Detection Approach to Understanding the
Identification of Fake News.” Perspectives on Psychological
Science 17 (1): 78–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620986135.
Bauer, Martin W., Nick Allum, and Steve Miller. 2007. “What Can We
Learn from 25 Years of PUS Survey Research? Liberating and Expanding the
Agenda.” Public Understanding of Science 16 (1): 79–95.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071287.
Bayes, Robin, and James N Druckman. 2021. “Motivated Reasoning and
Climate Change.” Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
42 (December): 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2021.02.009.
Beck, Ulrich. 1992. Risk society: towards a new modernity.
Repr. Theory, culture & society. London: Sage.
Bednarik, Peter, and Thomas Schultze. 2015. “The Effectiveness of
Imperfect Weighting in Advice Taking.” Judgment and Decision
Making 10 (3): 265–76. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500004666.
Bernard, Stéphane, Paul Harris, Nathalie Terrier, and Fabrice Clément.
2015. “Children Weigh the Number of Informants and Perceptual
Uncertainty When Identifying Objects.” Journal of
Experimental Child Psychology 136 (August): 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2015.03.009.
Bernard, Stéphane, Joëlle Proust, and Fabrice Clément. 2015.
“Four- to Six-Year-Old Children’s Sensitivity to Reliability
Versus Consensus in the Endorsement of Object Labels.” Child
Development 86 (4): 1112–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12366.
Bertsou, Eri. 2019. “Rethinking Political Distrust.”
European Political Science Review 11 (2): 213–30. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773919000080.
Besalú, Reinald, and Carles Pont-Sorribes. 2021. “Credibility of
Digital Political News in Spain: Comparison Between Traditional Media
and Social Media.” Social Sciences 10 (5): 170. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci10050170.
Besley, John C., Nicole M. Lee, and Geah Pressgrove. 2021a.
“Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public Perceptions of
Scientists.” Science Communication 43 (1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547.
———. 2021b. “Reassessing the Variables Used to Measure Public
Perceptions of Scientists.” Science Communication 43
(1): 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547020949547.
Besley, John C., and Leigh Anne Tiffany. 2023. “What Are You
Assessing When You Measure “Trust” in
Scientists with a Direct Measure?” Public Understanding of
Science 32 (6): 709–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625231161302.
Blancke, Stefaan, Frank Van Breusegem, Geert De Jaeger, Johan Braeckman,
and Marc Van Montagu. 2015. “Fatal Attraction: The Intuitive
Appeal of GMO Opposition.” Trends in Plant Science 20
(7): 414–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.03.011.
Bogert, J. M., Buczny ,J., Harvey ,J. A., and J. and Ellers. 2024.
“The Effect of Trust in Science and Media Use on Public Belief in
Anthropogenic Climate Change: A Meta-Analysis.” Environmental
Communication 18 (4): 484–509. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2023.2280749.
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. “Public Opinion Does Not Exist.”
Communication and Class Struggle 1: 124–30.
Brandt, Allan M. 1978. “Racism and Research: The Case of the
Tuskegee Syphilis Study.” The Hastings Center Report 8
(6): 21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3561468.
*Brashier, Nadia M., Gordon Pennycook, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G.
Rand. 2021. “Timing Matters When Correcting Fake News.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (5):
e2020043118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020043118.
Brashier, Nadia M., and Elizabeth J. Marsh. 2020. “Judging
Truth.” Annual Review of Psychology 71 (1): 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010419-050807.
Brennen, Tim, and Svein Magnussen. 2023. “Lie Detection: What
Works?” Current Directions in Psychological Science,
May, 096372142311730. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214231173095.
Brian, Kennedy, and Alec Tyson. 2023. “Americans’
Trust in Scientists, Positive Views of Science Continue to
Decline.” https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2023/11/14/americans-trust-in-scientists-positive-views-of-science-continue-to-decline/.
*Bronstein, Michael V., Gordon Pennycook, Adam Bear, David G. Rand, and
Tyrone D. Cannon. 2019. “Belief in Fake News Is Associated with
Delusionality, Dogmatism, Religious Fundamentalism, and Reduced Analytic
Thinking.” Journal of Applied Research in Memory and
Cognition 8 (1): 108–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2018.09.005.
Bruder, Martin, Peter Haffke, Nick Neave, Nina Nouripanah, and Roland
Imhoff. 2013. “Measuring Individual Differences in Generic Beliefs
in Conspiracy Theories Across Cultures: Conspiracy Mentality
Questionnaire.” Frontiers in Psychology 4. https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00225.
Bryanov, Kirill, Reinhold Kliegl, Olessia Koltsova, Alex Miltsov, Sergei
Pashakhin, Alexander Porshnev, Yadviga Sinyavskaya, Maksim Terpilovskii,
and Victoria Vziatysheva. 2023. “What Drives Perceptions of
Foreign News Coverage Credibility? A Cross-National Experiment Including
Kazakhstan, Russia, and Ukraine.” Political
Communication 40 (2): 115–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2172492.
Bryanov, Kirill, and Victoria Vziatysheva. 2021. “Determinants of
Individuals’ Belief in Fake News: A Scoping Review
Determinants of Belief in Fake News.” Edited by Stefano Triberti.
PLOS ONE 16 (6): e0253717. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253717.
Budescu, David V, and Adrian K Rantilla. 2000. “Confidence in
Aggregation of Expert Opinions.” Acta Psychologica 104
(3): 371–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-6918(00)00037-8.
Budescu, David V, Adrian K Rantilla, Hsiu-Ting Yu, and Tzur M Karelitz.
2003. “The Effects of Asymmetry Among Advisors on the Aggregation
of Their Opinions.” Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes 90 (1): 178–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00516-2.
Budescu, David V, and Hsiu-Ting Yu. 2007. “Aggregation of Opinions
Based on Correlated Cues and Advisors.” Journal of Behavioral
Decision Making 20 (2): 153–77. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.547.
Calvillo, Dustin P., and Thomas J. Smelter. 2020. “An Initial
Accuracy Focus Reduces the Effect of Prior Exposure on Perceived
Accuracy of News Headlines.” Cognitive Research: Principles
and Implications 5 (1): 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00257-y.
Capraro, Valerio, and Tatiana Celadin. n.d. ““I Think
This News Is Accurate”: Endorsing Accuracy Decreases the
Sharing of Fake News and Increases the Sharing of Real News.”
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.
Cartwright, Nancy, Jeremy Hardie, Eleonora Montuschi, Matthew Soleiman,
and Ann C. Thresher. 2022. The Tangle of Science: Reliability Beyond
Method, Rigour, and Objectivity. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chen, Eva E., Kathleen H. Corriveau, and Paul L. Harris. 2013.
“Children Trust a Consensus Composed of Outgroup Members-But Do
Not Retain That Trust.” Child Development 84 (1):
269–82. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01850.x.
Chen, Xi, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. 2023. “What Makes News
Sharable on Social Media?” Journal of Quantitative
Description: Digital Media 3.
*Clayton, Katherine, Spencer Blair, Jonathan A. Busam, Samuel Forstner,
John Glance, Guy Green, Anna Kawata, et al. 2020. “Real Solutions
for Fake News? Measuring the Effectiveness of General Warnings and
Fact-Check Tags in Reducing Belief in False Stories on Social
Media.” Political Behavior 42 (4): 1073–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-019-09533-0.
Clemm Von Hohenberg, Bernhard. 2023. “Truth and Bias, Left and
Right: Testing Ideological Asymmetries with a Realistic News
Supply.” Public Opinion Quarterly 87 (2): 267–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfad013.
Collins, Randall. 2002. The sociology of philosophies: a global
theory of intellectual change. 4. print., 1. Harvard Univ. Pr.
paperback ed., 2000. Cambridge, Mass. London: Belknap Press of Harvard
Univ. Press.
Cologna, Viktoria, Reto Knutti, Naomi Oreskes, and Michael Siegrist.
2021. “Majority of German Citizens, US Citizens and Climate
Scientists Support Policy Advocacy by Climate Researchers and Expect
Greater Political Engagement.” Environmental Research
Letters 16 (2): 024011. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/abd4ac.
Cologna, Viktoria, Niels G. Mede, Sebastian Berger, John Besley, Cameron
Brick, Marina Joubert, Edward Maibach, et al. 2024. “Trust in
Scientists and Their Role in Society Across 67 Countries,”
February. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6ay7s.
Cologna, Viktoria, Niels G. Mede, Sebastian Berger, John Besley, Cameron
Brick, Marina Joubert, Edward W. Maibach, et al. 2025. “Trust in
Scientists and Their Role in Society Across 68 Countries.”
Nature Human Behaviour, January, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5.
Cologna, Viktoria, and Michael Siegrist. 2020. “The Role of Trust
for Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation Behaviour: A
Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Environmental Psychology 69
(June): 101428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101428.
Coppock, Alexander. 2019. “Generalizing from Survey Experiments
Conducted on Mechanical Turk: A Replication Approach.”
Political Science Research and Methods 7 (3): 613–28. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2018.10.
Corriveau, Kathleen H., Maria Fusaro, and Paul L. Harris. 2009.
“Going With the Flow: Preschoolers Prefer Nondissenters as
Informants.” Psychological Science 20 (3): 372–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02291.x.
Crutchfield, Richard S. 1955. “Conformity and Character.”
American Psychologist 10 (5): 191–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040237.
Cuddy, Amy J. C., Susan T. Fiske, and Peter Glick. 2008. “Warmth
and Competence as Universal Dimensions of Social Perception: The
Stereotype Content Model and the BIAS Map.” In, 40:61–149.
Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(07)00002-0.
De Condorcet, Nicolas. 2014. Essai Sur l’application de l’analyse à
La Probabilité Des Décisions Rendues à La Pluralité Des Voix.
Cambridge University Press.
Desai, Saoirse Connor, Belinda Xie, and Brett K. Hayes. 2022.
“Getting to the Source of the Illusion of Consensus.”
Cognition 223 (June): 105023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105023.
Dias, Nicholas, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Emphasizing Publishers Does Not Effectively Reduce Susceptibility
to Misinformation on Social Media.” Harvard Kennedy School
Misinformation Review, January. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-001.
Dietrich, Franz, and Kai Spiekermann. 2013. “Epistemic Democracy
with Defensible Premises.” Economics and Philosophy 29
(1): 87–120. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266267113000096.
———. 2024. “Deliberation and the Wisdom of Crowds.”
Economic Theory, July. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-024-01595-4.
Douglas, Karen M., Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra
Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019.
“Understanding Conspiracy Theories.” Political
Psychology 40 (S1): 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568.
Druckman, James N. 2015. “Communicating Policy-Relevant
Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (S1):
58–69. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096515000438.
———. 2022. “Threats to Science: Politicization, Misinformation,
and Inequalities.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of
Political and Social Science 700 (1): 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/00027162221095431.
Druckman, James N., and Mary C. McGrath. 2019. “The Evidence for
Motivated Reasoning in Climate Change Preference Formation.”
Nature Climate Change 9 (2): 111–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0360-1.
Drummond, Caitlin, and Baruch Fischhoff. 2017. “Individuals with
Greater Science Literacy and Education Have More Polarized Beliefs on
Controversial Science Topics.” Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences 114 (36): 9587–92. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704882114.
Durant, John R., Geoffrey A. Evans, and Geoffrey P. Thomas. 1989.
“The Public Understanding of Science.” Nature 340
(6228): 11–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/340011a0.
Egan, Patrick J., and Megan Mullin. 2017. “Climate Change: US
Public Opinion.” Annual Review of Political Science 20:
209–27.
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, Ming Boyer, Sophie Lecheler, and Loes Aaldering.
2022. “Populist Attitudes and Politicians’
Disinformation Accusations: Effects on Perceptions of Media and
Politicians.” Journal of Communication 72 (6): 619–32.
https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac031.
Egelhofer, Jana Laura, and Sophie Lecheler. 2019. “Fake News as a
Two-Dimensional Phenomenon: A Framework and Research Agenda.”
Annals of the International Communication Association 43 (2):
97–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2019.1602782.
Epstein, Ziv, Nathaniel Sirlin, Antonio Arechar, Gordon Pennycook, and
David Rand. 2023. “The Social Media Context Interferes with Truth
Discernment.” Science Advances 9 (9): eabo6169.
*Erlich, Aaron, and Calvin Garner. 2023. “Is Pro-Kremlin
Disinformation Effective? Evidence from Ukraine.” The
International Journal of Press/Politics 28 (1): 5–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612211045221.
*Faragó, Laura, Péter Krekó, and Gábor Orosz. 2023. “Hungarian,
Lazy, and Biased: The Role of Analytic Thinking and Partisanship in Fake
News Discernment on a Hungarian Representative Sample.”
Scientific Reports 13 (1): 178. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26724-8.
*Fazio, Lisa, David Rand, Stephan Lewandowsky, Mark Susmann, Adam J.
Berinsky, Andrew Guess, Panayiota Kendeou, et al. n.d. “Combating
Misinformation: A Megastudy of Nine Interventions Designed to Reduce the
Sharing of and Belief in False and Misleading Headlines.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/uyjha.
Feinstein, Justin S., Melissa C. Duff, and Daniel Tranel. 2010.
“Sustained Experience of Emotion After Loss of Memory in Patients
with Amnesia.” Proceedings of the National Academy of
Sciences 107 (17): 7674–79. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0914054107.
Fernbach, Philip M., Nicholas Light, Sydney E. Scott, Yoel Inbar, and
Paul Rozin. 2019. “Extreme Opponents of Genetically Modified Foods
Know the Least but Think They Know the Most.” Nature Human
Behaviour 3 (3): 251–56. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-018-0520-3.
Fiske, S. T., and C. Dupree. 2014. “Gaining Trust as Well as
Respect in Communicating to Motivated Audiences about Science
Topics.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
111 (Supplement_4): 13593–97. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1317505111.
Fletcher, Richard, and Rasmus-Kleis Nielsen. 2017. “People Dont
Trust News Mediaand This Is Key to the Global
Misinformation Debate.” AA. VV., Understanding and Addressing
the Disinformation Ecosystem, 13–17.
Forgas, Joseph P., and Simon M. Laham. 2016. “Halo
Effects.” In, 276–90. Psychology Press.
Fricker, Elizabeth. 2006. “Testimony and Epistemic
Autonomy.” In, edited by Jennifer Lackey and Ernest Sosa, 1st
ed., 225–50. Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199276011.003.0011.
Fuentes, Agustín. 2023. “Systemic Racism in Science: Reactions
Matter.” Science 381 (6655): eadj7675. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adj7675.
Funk, Cary, Courtney Johnson, and Meg Hefferon. 2019. “5 Key
Findings about Public Trust in Scientists in the u.s.” https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/08/05/5-key-findings-about-public-trust-in-scientists-in-the-u-s/.
Funk, Cary, and Brian Kennedy. 2020. “Public Confidence in
Scientists Has Remained Stable for Decades.”
Funk, Cary, Alec Tyson, Brian Kennedy, and Courtney Johnson. 2020.
“Science and Scientists Held in High Esteem Across Global
Publics.” https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2020/09/29/science-and-scientists-held-in-high-esteem-across-global-publics/.
Fusaro, Maria, and Paul L. Harris. 2008. “Children Assess
Informant Reliability Using Bystanders’ Non-Verbal
Cues.” Developmental Science 11 (5): 771–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00728.x.
Galton, Francis. 1907. “Vox Populi.” Nature 75
(1949): 450–51. https://doi.org/10.1038/075450a0.
Garrett, R. Kelly, and Robert M. Bond. 2021.
“Conservatives’ Susceptibility to Political
Misperceptions.” Science Advances 7 (23): eabf1234. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abf1234.
Gauchat, Gordon. 2011. “The Cultural Authority of Science: Public
Trust and Acceptance of Organized Science.” Public
Understanding of Science 20 (6): 751–70. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510365246.
———. 2012. “Politicization of Science in the Public Sphere: A
Study of Public Trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010.”
American Sociological Review 77 (2): 167–87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412438225.
———. 2023. “The Legitimacy of Science.” Annual Review
of Sociology 49 (1): 263–79. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-030320-035037.
Gauchat, Gordon, and Kenneth T. Andrews. 2018. “The
Cultural-Cognitive Mapping of Scientific Professions.”
American Sociological Review 83 (3): 567–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122418773353.
Gawronski, Bertram, Nyx L. Ng, and Dillon M. Luke. 2023. “Truth
Sensitivity and Partisan Bias in Responses to Misinformation.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 152 (8): 2205–36.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001381.
Gibbons, Robert D., Donald R. Hedeker, and John M. Davis. 1993.
“Estimation of Effect Size from a Series of Experiments Involving
Paired Comparisons.” Journal of Educational Statistics
18 (3): 271–79. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986018003271.
Giddens, Anthony. 1991. Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and
Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford, Calif: Stanford
University Press.
Gligorić, Vukašin, Gerben A. van Kleef, and Bastiaan T. Rutjens. 2024.
“How Social Evaluations Shape Trust in 45 Types of
Scientists.” PLOS ONE 19 (4): e0299621. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0299621.
Globig, Laura K, Nora Holtz, and Tali Sharot. 2023. “Changing the
Incentive Structure of Social Media Platforms to Halt the Spread of
Misinformation.” eLife 12 (June): e85767. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.85767.
*Gottlieb, Jessica, Claire Adida, and Richard Moussa. n.d.
“Reducing Misinformation in a Polarized Context: Experimental
Evidence from Côte d’ivoire.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/6x4wy.
Guay, Brian, Adam J. Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. 2023.
“How to Think about Whether Misinformation Interventions
Work.” Nature Human Behaviour 7 (8): 1231–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01667-w.
Guay, Brian, Adam Berinsky, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. n.d.
“How to Think about Whether Misinformation Interventions
Work.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gv8qx.
*Guess, Andrew M., Michael Lerner, Benjamin Lyons, Jacob M. Montgomery,
Brendan Nyhan, Jason Reifler, and Neelanjan Sircar. 2020. “A
Digital Media Literacy Intervention Increases Discernment Between
Mainstream and False News in the United States and India.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 117 (27):
15536–45. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1920498117.
*Guess, Andrew, Shannon McGregor, Gordon Pennycook, and David Rand. n.d.
“Unbundling Digital Media Literacy Tips: Results from Two
Experiments.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/u34fp.
Gunaydin, Gul, Emre Selcuk, and Vivian Zayas. 2017. “Impressions
Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live
Interaction.” Social Psychological and Personality
Science 8 (1): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550616662123.
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. Jürgen Habermas on society and politics: a
reader. Edited by Steven Seidman. 1. [print.]. Sociology, political
science, philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.
Hacquin, Anne-Sophie, Sacha Altay, Lene Aarøe, and Hugo Mercier. 2021.
“Disgust Sensitivity and Public Opinion on Nuclear Energy.”
Journal of Environmental Psychology, 101749.
Hahn, Ulrike, Christoph Merdes, and Momme von Sydow. 2018. “How
Good Is Your Evidence and How Would You Know?” Topics in
Cognitive Science 10 (4): 660–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12374.
*Hameleers, Michael, Marina Tulin, Claes De Vreese, Toril Aalberg, Peter
Van Aelst, Ana Sofia Cardenal, Nicoleta Corbu, et al. 2023.
“Mistakenly Misinformed or Intentionally Deceived?
Mis- and Disinformation Perceptions on the Russian War in
Ukraine Among Citizens in 19 Countries.” European Journal of
Political Research, December, 1475–6765.12646. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12646.
Hardwig, John. 1991. “The Role of Trust in Knowledge.”
The Journal of Philosophy 88 (12): 693. https://doi.org/10.2307/2027007.
Harkins, Stephen G., and Richard E. Petty. 1987. “Information
Utility and the Multiple Source Effect.” Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology 52 (2): 260.
Harrer, Mathias, Pim Cuijpers, Furukawa Toshi A, and David D Ebert.
2021. Doing Meta-Analysis with r: A Hands-on Guide. 1st ed.
Boca Raton, FL; London: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press.
Harries, Clare, Ilan Yaniv, and Nigel Harvey. 2004. “Combining
Advice: The Weight of a Dissenting Opinion in the Consensus.”
Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 17 (5): 333–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.474.
Harris, Keith Raymond. 2023. “Conspiracy Theories, Populism, and
Epistemic Autonomy.” Journal of the American Philosophical
Association 9 (1): 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2021.44.
Harvey, Nigel, and Ilan Fischer. 1997. “Taking Advice: Accepting
Help, Improving Judgment, and Sharing Responsibility.”
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 70 (2):
117–33. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1997.2697.
Hastie, Reid, and Tatsuya Kameda. 2005. “The Robust Beauty of
Majority Rules in Group Decisions.” Psychological Review
112 (2): 494–508. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.494.
Hendriks, Friederike, Dorothe Kienhues, and Rainer Bromme. 2015.
“Measuring Laypeople’s Trust in Experts in a Digital
Age: The Muenster Epistemic Trustworthiness Inventory (METI).”
Edited by Jelte M. Wicherts. PLOS ONE 10 (10): e0139309. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0139309.
———. 2016. “Trust in Science and the Science of Trust.” In,
edited by Bernd Blöbaum, 143–59. Cham: Springer International
Publishing. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-28059-2_8.
———. 2020. “Replication Crisis = Trust Crisis? The Effect of
Successful Vs Failed Replications on Laypeople’s Trust in
Researchers and Research.” Public Understanding of
Science 29 (3): 270–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520902383.
Herrmann, Patricia A., Cristine H. Legare, Paul L. Harris, and Harvey
Whitehouse. 2013. “Stick to the Script: The Effect of Witnessing
Multiple Actors on Children’s Imitation.”
Cognition 129 (3): 536–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2013.08.010.
Hess, Nicole H., and Edward H. Hagen. 2006. “Psychological
Adaptations for Assessing Gossip Veracity.” Human Nature
17 (3): 337–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12110-006-1013-z.
Heyman, Richard E., Michael F. Lorber, J. Mark Eddy, and Tessa V. West.
2014. “Behavioral Observation and Coding.” In, edited by
Charles M. Judd and Harry T. Reis, 2nd ed., 345–72. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996481.018.
Higgins, Julian PT, James Thomas, Jacqueline Chandler, Miranda Cumpston,
Tianjing Li, Matthew J. Page, and Vivian A. Welch. 2019. Cochrane
Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley &
Sons.
Higham, Philip A., Ariana Modirrousta-Galian, and Tina Seabrooke. 2024.
“Mean Rating Difference Scores Are Poor Measures of Discernment:
The Role of Response Criteria.” Current Opinion in
Psychology 56 (April): 101785. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101785.
*Hlatky, Roman. n.d. “Unintended Consequences? Russian
Disinformation and Public Opinion.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/85vmt.
Hoes, Emma, Brian Aitken, Jingwen Zhang, Tomasz Gackowski, and Magdalena
Wojcieszak. 2023. “Prominent Misinformation Interventions Reduce
Misperceptions but Increase Skepticism.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/zmpdu.
Hornsey, Matthew J. 2020. “Why Facts Are Not Enough: Understanding
and Managing the Motivated Rejection of Science.” Current
Directions in Psychological Science 29 (6): 583–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420969364.
Hornsey, Matthew J., and Kelly S. Fielding. 2017. “Attitude Roots
and Jiu Jitsu Persuasion: Understanding and Overcoming the Motivated
Rejection of Science.” American Psychologist 72 (5):
459–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0040437.
Hornsey, Matthew J., Emily A. Harris, Paul G. Bain, and Kelly S.
Fielding. 2016. “Meta-Analyses of the Determinants and Outcomes of
Belief in Climate Change.” Nature Climate Change 6 (6):
622–26. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2943.
Hornsey, Matthew J., Emily A. Harris, and Kelly S. Fielding. 2018a.
“The Psychological Roots of Anti-Vaccination Attitudes: A
24-Nation Investigation.” Health Psychology 37 (4):
307–15. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000586.
———. 2018b. “Relationships Among Conspiratorial Beliefs,
Conservatism and Climate Scepticism Across Nations.” Nature
Climate Change 8 (7): 614–20. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0157-2.
Huang, Jacob Poushter, Moira Fagan and Christine. 2021. “Americans
Are Less Concerned but More Divided on
Climate Change Than People Elsewhere.” https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2021/09/14/americans-are-less-concerned-but-more-divided-on-climate-change-than-people-elsewhere/.
Hutmacher, Fabian, Regina Reichardt, and Markus Appel. 2024.
“Motivated Reasoning about Climate Change and the Influence of
Numeracy, Need for Cognition, and the Dark Factor of
Personality.” Scientific Reports 14 (1): 5615. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55930-9.
Intemann, Kristen. 2023. “Science Communication and Public Trust
in Science.” Interdisciplinary Science Reviews 48 (2):
350–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/03080188.2022.2152244.
Jayles, Bertrand, Hye-rin Kim, Ramón Escobedo, Stéphane Cezera, Adrien
Blanchet, Tatsuya Kameda, Clément Sire, and Guy Theraulaz. 2017.
“How Social Information Can Improve Estimation Accuracy in Human
Groups.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
114 (47): 12620–25. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1703695114.
Judd, Emily J., Jessica E. Tierney, Daniel J. Lunt, Isabel P. Montañez,
Brian T. Huber, Scott L. Wing, and Paul J. Valdes. 2024. “A
485-Million-Year History of Earth’s Surface
Temperature.” Science 385 (6715): eadk3705. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adk3705.
Kahan, Dan M. 2015. “Climate-Science Communication and the
Measurement Problem.” Political Psychology 36 (S1):
1–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12244.
Kahan, Dan M., Ellen Peters, Maggie Wittlin, Paul Slovic, Lisa Larrimore
Ouellette, Donald Braman, and Gregory Mandel. 2012. “The
Polarizing Impact of Science Literacy and Numeracy on Perceived Climate
Change Risks.” Nature Climate Change 2 (10): 732–35. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1547.
Kämmer, Juliane E., Shoham Choshen-Hillel, Johannes Müller-Trede,
Stephanie L. Black, and Jürgen Weibler. 2023. “A Systematic Review
of Empirical Studies on Advice-Based Decisions in Behavioral and
Organizational Research.” Decision 10 (2): 107–37. https://doi.org/10.1037/dec0000199.
Karlsen, Rune, and Toril Aalberg. 2023. “Social Media and Trust in
News: An Experimental Study of the Effect of Facebook on News Story
Credibility.” Digital Journalism 11 (1): 144–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2021.1945938.
Kennedy, Alec Tyson, and Brian. 2024. “Public Trust in Scientists
and Views on Their Role in Policymaking.” https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2024/11/14/public-trust-in-scientists-and-views-on-their-role-in-policymaking/.
Kerr, John R., and Marc S. Wilson. 2021. “Right-Wing
Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Predict Rejection of
Science and Scientists.” Group Processes & Intergroup
Relations 24 (4): 550–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430221992126.
Koenig, Melissa A., Fabrice Clément, and Paul L. Harris. 2004.
“Trust in Testimony: Children’s Use of True and False
Statements.” Psychological Science 15 (10): 694–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00742.x.
*Koetke, Jonah, Karina Schumann, Tenelle Porter, and Ilse Smilo-Morgan.
2023. “Fallibility Salience Increases Intellectual Humility:
Implications for People’s Willingness to Investigate
Political Misinformation.” Personality and Social Psychology
Bulletin 49 (5): 806–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672221080979.
Koetke, Jonah, Karina Schumann, Shauna M. Bowes, and Nina Vaupotič.
2024. “The Effect of Seeing Scientists as Intellectually Humble on
Trust in Scientists and Their Research.” Nature Human
Behaviour, November, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-02060-x.
Koetke, Jonah, Karina Schumann, and Tenelle Porter. 2021. “Trust
in Science Increases Conservative Support for Social Distancing.”
Group Processes & Intergroup Relations 24 (4): 680–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220985918.
König, Laura M, Marlene Sophie Altenmüller, Julian Fick, Jan Crusius,
Oliver Genschow, and Melanie Sauerland. 2023. “How to Communicate
Science to the Public? Recommendations for Effective Written
Communication Derived from a Systematic Review.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/cwbrs.
Krause, Nicole M, Dominique Brossard, Dietram A Scheufele, Michael A
Xenos, and Keith Franke. 2019.
“Trendsamericans’ Trust in Science and
Scientists.” Public Opinion Quarterly 83 (4): 817–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfz041.
*Kreps, Sarah E., and Douglas L. Kriner. 2023. “Assessing
Misinformation Recall and Accuracy Perceptions: Evidence from the
COVID-19 Pandemic.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation
Review, October. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-123.
Ladha, Krishna K. 1992. “The Condorcet Jury Theorem, Free Speech,
and Correlated Votes.” American Journal of Political
Science 36 (3): 617. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111584.
Lantian, Anthony, Dominique Muller, Cécile Nurra, and Karen M. Douglas.
2016. “Measuring Belief in Conspiracy Theories: Validation of a
French and English Single-Item Scale.” International Review
of Social Psychology 29 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.5334/irsp.8.
Larrick, Richard P., and Jack B. Soll. 2006. “Intuitions About
Combining Opinions: Misappreciation of the Averaging Principle.”
Management Science 52 (1): 111–27. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1050.0459.
*Lee, Eun-Ju, and Jeong-woo Jang. 2023. “How Political Identity
and Misinformation Priming Affect Truth Judgments and Sharing Intention
of Partisan News.” Digital Journalism 0 (0): 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2022.2163413.
Lee, John J. 2021. “Party Polarization and Trust in Science: What
about Democrats?” Socius 7 (January): 23780231211010101.
https://doi.org/10.1177/23780231211010101.
Levine, Timothy R. 2014. “Truth-Default Theory (TDT): A Theory of
Human Deception and Deception Detection.” Journal of Language
and Social Psychology 33 (4): 378–92. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X14535916.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, Gilles E. Gignac, and Klaus Oberauer. 2013.
“The Role of Conspiracist Ideation and Worldviews in Predicting
Rejection of Science.” PLOS ONE 8 (10): e75637. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0075637.
Lewandowsky, Stephan, and Klaus Oberauer. 2016. “Motivated
Rejection of Science.” Current Directions in Psychological
Science 25 (4): 217–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416654436.
———. 2021. “Worldview-Motivated Rejection of Science and the Norms
of Science.” Cognition 215 (October): 104820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104820.
Li, Nan, and Yachao Qian. 2022. “Polarization of Public Trust in
Scientists Between 1978 and 2018: Insights from a Cross-Decade
Comparison Using Interpretable Machine Learning.” Politics
and the Life Sciences 41 (1): 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2021.18.
Linden, Sander van der. 2021. “The Gateway Belief Model (GBM): A
Review and Research Agenda for Communicating the Scientific Consensus on
Climate Change.” Current Opinion in Psychology 42
(December): 7–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.01.005.
Lindholt, Marie Fly, Frederik Jørgensen, Alexander Bor, and Michael Bang
Petersen. 2021. “Public Acceptance of COVID-19 Vaccines:
Cross-National Evidence on Levels and Individual-Level Predictors Using
Observational Data.” BMJ Open 11 (6): e048172. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-048172.
Liquin, Emily G., and Tania Lombrozo. 2022. “Motivated to Learn:
An Account of Explanatory Satisfaction.” Cognitive
Psychology 132 (February): 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2021.101453.
Lombrozo, Tania. 2006. “The Structure and Function of
Explanations.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 10 (10):
464–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.08.004.
———. 2007. “Simplicity and Probability in Causal
Explanation.” Cognitive Psychology 55 (3): 232–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogpsych.2006.09.006.
Lopes, Diniz, Jorge Vala, and Leonel Garcia-Marques. 2007. “Social
Validation of Everyday Knowledge: Heterogeneity and Consensus
Functionality.” Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and
Practice 11 (3): 223–39. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.11.3.223.
*Lühring, Jula, Apeksha Shetty, Corinna Koschmieder, David Garcia, Annie
Waldherr, and Hannah Metzler. n.d. “Emotions in Misinformation
Studies: Distinguishing Affective State from Emotional Response and
Misinformation Recognition from Acceptance.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/udqms.
Luo, Mufan, Jeffrey T. Hancock, and David M. Markowitz. 2022.
“Credibility Perceptions and Detection Accuracy of Fake News
Headlines on Social Media: Effects of Truth-Bias and Endorsement
Cues.” Communication Research 49 (2): 171–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650220921321.
Lupia, Arthur, David B. Allison, Kathleen Hall Jamieson, Jennifer
Heimberg, Magdalena Skipper, and Susan M. Wolf. 2024. “Trends in
US Public Confidence in Science and Opportunities for Progress.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 121 (11):
e2319488121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2319488121.
*Lutzke, Lauren, Caitlin Drummond, Paul Slovic, and Joseph Árvai. 2019.
“Priming Critical Thinking: Simple Interventions Limit the
Influence of Fake News about Climate Change on Facebook.”
Global Environmental Change 58 (September): 101964. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2019.101964.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Andy J. King, and Kimberly Kaphingst. n.d. “A
Health Media Literacy Intervention Increases Skepticism of Both
Inaccurate and Accurate Cancer News Among U.S. Adults.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/hm9ty.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Ariana Modirrousta-Galian, Sacha Altay, and Nikita
Antonia Salovich. 2024. “Reduce Blind Spots to Improve News
Discernment? Performance Feedback Reduces Overconfidence but Does Not
Improve Subsequent Discernment,” February. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/kgfrb.
*Lyons, Benjamin, Jacob Montgomery, and Jason Reifler. n.d.
“Partisanship and Older Americans’ Engagement with
Dubious Political News.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/etb89.
*Maertens, Rakoen, Friedrich M. Götz, Hudson F. Golino, Jon Roozenbeek,
Claudia R. Schneider, Yara Kyrychenko, John R. Kerr, et al. 2024.
“The Misinformation Susceptibility Test (MIST): A Psychometrically
Validated Measure of News Veracity Discernment.” Behavior
Research Methods 56 (3): 1863–99. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-023-02124-2.
Maertens, Rakoen, Friedrich Martin Götz, Claudia R. Schneider, Jon
Roozenbeek, John R Kerr, Stefan Stieger, William Patrick McClanahan,
Karly Drabot, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. “The Misinformation
Susceptibility Test (MIST): A Psychometrically Validated Measure of News
Veracity Discernment.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/gk68h.
Mahr, Johannes B., and Gergely Csibra. 2018. “Why Do We Remember?
The Communicative Function of Episodic Memory.” Behavioral
and Brain Sciences 41 (January): e1. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000012.
Mairal, Santos *Espina, Florencia Bustos, Guillermo Solovey, and Joaquín
Navajas. 2023. “Interactive Crowdsourcing to Fact-Check
Politicians.” Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied, August. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000492.
Mannes, Albert E. 2009. “Are We Wise About the Wisdom of Crowds?
The Use of Group Judgments in Belief Revision.” Management
Science 55 (8): 1267–79. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1031.
*Martel, Cameron, Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Reliance on Emotion Promotes Belief in Fake News.”
Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications 5 (1): 47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
Martel, Cameron, Jennifer Nancy Lee Allen, Gordon Pennycook, and David
Gertler Rand. 2022. “Crowds Can Effectively Identify
Misinformation at Scale.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/2tjk7.
Mayer, Roger C., James H. Davis, and F. David Schoorman. 1995. “An
Integrative Model of Organizational Trust.” The Academy of
Management Review 20 (3): 709. https://doi.org/10.2307/258792.
Maynard-Smith, John, and David Harper. 2003. Animal Signals.
Oxford University Press.
Mede, Niels G., Viktoria Cologna, Sebastian Berger, John Besley, Cameron
Brick, Marina Joubert, Edward W. Maibach, et al. 2025.
“Perceptions of Science, Science Communication, and Climate Change
Attitudes in 68 Countries the TISP Dataset.”
Scientific Data 12 (1): 114. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04100-7.
Mercier, Hugo. 2016. “The Argumentative Theory: Predictions and
Empirical Evidence.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20
(9): 689–700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.001.
———. 2017. “How Gullible Are We? A Review of the Evidence from
Psychology and Social Science.” Review of General
Psychology 21 (2): 103–22. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000111.
———. 2020. Not Born Yesterday: The Science of Who We Trust and What
We Believe. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691198842.
Mercier, Hugo, and Nicolas Claidière. 2022. “Does Discussion Make
Crowds Any Wiser?” Cognition 222 (May): 104912. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104912.
Mercier, Hugo, and Helena Miton. 2019. “Utilizing Simple Cues to
Informational Dependency.” Evolution and Human Behavior
40 (3): 301–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.001.
Mercier, Hugo, and Olivier Morin. 2019. “Majority Rules: How Good
Are We at Aggregating Convergent Opinions?” Evolutionary
Human Sciences 1: e6. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2019.6.
Merton, Robert K. 1979. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and
Empirical Investigations. Edited by Norman W. Storer. Chicago, IL:
University of Chicago Press. https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/S/bo28451565.html.
Metzger, Miriam J. 2007. “Making Sense of Credibility on the Web:
Models for Evaluating Online Information and Recommendations for Future
Research.” Journal of the American Society for Information
Science and Technology 58 (13): 2078–91. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20672.
Mihailidis, Paul, and Bobbie Foster. 2021. “The Cost of Disbelief:
Fracturing News Ecosystems in an Age of Rampant Media Cynicism.”
American Behavioral Scientist 65 (4): 616–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764220978470.
Miller, Jon D. 1998. “The Measurement of Civic Scientific
Literacy.” Public Understanding of Science 7 (3):
203–23. https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-6625/7/3/001.
———. 2004. “Public Understanding of, and Attitudes Toward,
Scientific Research: What We Know and What We Need to Know.”
Public Understanding of Science 13 (3): 273–94. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504044908.
Miton, Helena, and Hugo Mercier. 2015. “Cognitive Obstacles to
Pro-Vaccination Beliefs.” Trends in Cognitive Sciences
19 (11): 633–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.007.
*Modirrousta-Galian, Ariana, Philip A. Higham, and Tina Seabrooke. 2023.
“Effects of Inductive Learning and Gamification on News Veracity
Discernment.” Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Applied 29 (3): 599–619. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000458.
———. 2024. “Wordless Wisdom: The Dominant Role of Tacit Knowledge
in True and Fake News Discrimination.” Journal of Applied
Research in Memory and Cognition.
Modirrousta-Galian, Ariana, and Philip A. Higham. 2023. “Gamified
Inoculation Interventions Do Not Improve Discrimination Between True and
Fake News: Reanalyzing Existing Research with Receiver Operating
Characteristic Analysis.” Journal of Experimental Psychology:
General.
Molleman, Lucas, Alan N. Tump, Andrea Gradassi, Stefan Herzog, Bertrand
Jayles, Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers, and Wouter van den Bos. 2020.
“Strategies for Integrating Disparate Social Information.”
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 287
(1939): 20202413. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2413.
Mont’Alverne, Camila, Sumitra Badrinathan, A. Ross Arguedas, Benjamin
Toff, Richard Fletcher, and R. Nielsen. 2022. “The Trust Gap: How
and Why News on Digital Platforms Is Viewed More Sceptically Versus News
in General.”
Morgan, Thomas J. H., Kevin N. Laland, and Paul L. Harris. 2015.
“The Development of Adaptive Conformity in Young Children: Effects
of Uncertainty and Consensus.” Developmental Science 18
(4): 511–24. https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12231.
Morgan, Thomas J. H., L. E. Rendell, M. Ehn, W. Hoppitt, and K. N.
Laland. 2012. “The Evolutionary Basis of Human Social
Learning.” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological
Sciences 279 (1729): 653–62. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2011.1172.
Mourão, Rachel R., and Craig T. Robertson. 2019. “Fake News as
Discursive Integration: An Analysis of Sites That Publish False,
Misleading, Hyperpartisan and Sensational Information.”
Journalism Studies 20 (14): 2077–95. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461670X.2019.1566871.
*Muda, Rafał, Gordon Pennycook, Damian Hamerski, and Michał Białek.
2023. “People Are Worse at Detecting Fake News in Their Foreign
Language.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied
29 (4): 712–24. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000475.
Munro, Geoffrey D. 2010. “The Scientific Impotence Excuse:
Discounting Belief-Threatening Scientific Abstracts.” Journal
of Applied Social Psychology 40 (3): 579–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00588.x.
Nadelson, Louis S, and Kimberly K Hardy. 2015. “Trust in Science
and Scientists and the Acceptance of Evolution.” Evolution:
Education and Outreach 8 (1): 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-015-0037-4.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering. 2024. Understanding and
Addressing Misinformation about Science.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016.
Science Literacy: Concepts, Contexts, and Consequences. Edited
by Catherine E. Snow and Kenne A. Dibner. Washington, D.C.: National
Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23595.
National Science Board, National Science Foundation. 2024.
“Science and Technology: Public Perceptions, Awareness, and
Information Sources.” https://ncses.nsf.gov/pubs/nsb20244.
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Kirsten Eddy, Craig T. Robertson, and
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2023. “Digital News Report 2023.”
Newman, Nic, Richard Fletcher, Craig T Robertson, Kirsten Eddy, and
Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2022. “Reuters Institute Digital News Report
2022.”
Nguyen, C. Thi. 2020. “Cognitive Islands and Runaway Echo
Chambers: Problems for Epistemic Dependence on Experts.”
Synthese 197 (7): 2803–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1692-0.
Nobles, Melissa, Chad Womack, Ambroise Wonkam, and Elizabeth Wathuti.
2022. “Science Must Overcome Its Racist Legacy:
Nature’s Guest Editors Speak.” Nature 606
(7913): 225–27. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-022-01527-z.
Noy, Shiri, and Timothy L. O’Brien. 2019. “Science for Good? The
Effects of Education and National Context on Perceptions of
Science.” Public Understanding of Science 28 (8):
897–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662519863575.
*OECD. 2022. “An International Effort Using Behavioural Science to
Tackle the Spread of Misinformation.” https://doi.org/10.1787/b7709d4f-en.
Oreskes, Naomi. 2019. Why trust science? The University Center
for Human Values series. Princeton Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Page, Matthew J., Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle
Boutron, Tammy C. Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, et al.
2021. “The PRISMA 2020 Statement: An Updated Guideline for
Reporting Systematic Reviews.” BMJ 372 (March): n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71.
Pardo, Rafael, and Félix Calvo. 2004. “The Cognitive Dimension of
Public Perceptions of Science: Methodological Issues.” Public
Understanding of Science 13 (3): 203–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504045002.
Paul, Christopher, and Miriam Matthews. 2016. “The Russian
“Firehose of Falsehood” Propaganda
Model.” Rand Corporation 2 (7): 1–10.
*Pehlivanoglu, Didem, Tian Lin, Farha Deceus, Amber Heemskerk, Natalie
C. Ebner, and Brian S. Cahill. 2021. “The Role of Analytical
Reasoning and Source Credibility on the Evaluation of Real and Fake
Full-Length News Articles.” Cognitive Research: Principles
and Implications 6 (1): 24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00292-3.
*Pennycook, Gordon, Tyrone D. Cannon, and David G. Rand. 2018.
“Prior Exposure Increases Perceived Accuracy of Fake News.”
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147 (12): 1865–80.
https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000465.
*Pennycook, Gordon, Jonathon McPhetres, Yunhao Zhang, Jackson G. Lu, and
David G. Rand. 2020. “Fighting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social
Media: Experimental Evidence for a Scalable Accuracy-Nudge
Intervention.” Psychological Science 31 (7): 770–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620939054.
*Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. 2020. “Who Falls for Fake
News? The Roles of Bullshit Receptivity, Overclaiming, Familiarity, and
Analytic Thinking.” Journal of Personality 88 (2):
185–200. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12476.
Pennycook, Gordon, Jabin Binnendyk, Christie Newton, and David G. Rand.
2021. “A Practical Guide to Doing Behavioral Research on Fake News
and Misinformation.” Collabra: Psychology 7 (1): 25293.
https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.25293.
Pennycook, Gordon, Jabin Binnendyk, and David Rand. 2022.
“Overconfidently Conspiratorial: Conspiracy Believers Are
Dispositionally Overconfident and Massively Overestimate How Much Others
Agree with Them,” December. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/d5fz2.
Pennycook, Gordon, Ziv Epstein, Mohsen Mosleh, Antonio A. Arechar, Dean
Eckles, and David G. Rand. 2021. “Shifting Attention to Accuracy
Can Reduce Misinformation Online.” Nature 592 (7855):
590–95. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2.
Pennycook, Gordon, and David G. Rand. 2019. “Lazy, Not Biased:
Susceptibility to Partisan Fake News Is Better Explained by Lack of
Reasoning Than by Motivated Reasoning.” Cognition 188
(July): 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011.
*Pereira, Frederico Batista, Natália S. Bueno, Felipe Nunes, and Nara
Pavão. 2023. “Inoculation Reduces Misinformation: Experimental
Evidence from Multidimensional Interventions in Brazil.”
Journal of Experimental Political Science, July, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1017/XPS.2023.11.
Persson, Emil, David Andersson, Lina Koppel, Daniel Västfjäll, and
Gustav Tinghög. 2021. “A Preregistered Replication of Motivated
Numeracy.” Cognition 214 (September): 104768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2021.104768.
Petersen, Michael Bang, Alexander Bor, Frederik Jørgensen, and Marie Fly
Lindholt. 2021. “Transparent Communication about Negative Features
of COVID-19 Vaccines Decreases Acceptance but Increases Trust.”
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118 (29):
e2024597118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2024597118.
Pfänder, Jan, Benoît De Courson, and Hugo Mercier. 2025. “How Wise
Is the Crowd: Can We Infer People Are Accurate and Competent Merely
Because They Agree with Each Other?” Cognition 255
(February): 106005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.106005.
Pfänder, Jan, Lou Kerzreho, and Hugo Mercier. 2024.
“Quasi-Universal Acceptance of Basic Science in the US,”
December. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/qc43v.
Pfänder, Jan, Sophie De Rouilhan, and Hugo Mercier. 2025.
“Trusting but Forgetting Impressive Science.” https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/argq5_v1.
Pillow, Bradford H. 1989. “Early Understanding of Perception as a
Source of Knowledge.” Journal of Experimental Child
Psychology 47 (1): 116–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(89)90066-0.
Popper, Karl R. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations: The Growth of
Scientific Knowledge. Routledge Classics. London ; New York:
Routledge.
Posit team. 2023. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for
r. Boston, MA: Posit Software, PBC. http://www.posit.co/.
Pummerer, Lotte, Lukas Fock, Kevin Winter, and Kai Sassenberg. 2024.
“Conspiracy Beliefs and Majority Influence.” The
Journal of Social Psychology, September, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2024.2397491.
Pustejovsky, James E. 2019. “Simulating Correlated Standardized
Mean Differences for Meta-Analysis.” https://www.jepusto.com/simulating-correlated-smds/.
R Core Team. 2022. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical
Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
https://www.R-project.org/.
Rainie, Lee, and Cary Funk. 2015. “Public and
Scientists’ Views on Science and Society.” https://www.pewresearch.org/science/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/.
Ranney, Michael Andrew, and Dav Clark. 2016. “Climate Change
Conceptual Change: Scientific Information Can Transform
Attitudes.” Topics in Cognitive Science 8 (1): 49–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12187.
*Rathje, Steve, Jon Roozenbeek, Jay J. Van Bavel, and Sander Van Der
Linden. 2023. “Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of
(Mis)information.” Nature Human Behaviour, March. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w.
Rathje, Steve, Jon Roozenbeek, Jay J. Van Bavel, and Sander Van Der
Linden. 2023. “Accuracy and Social Motivations Shape Judgements of
(Mis)information.” Nature Human Behaviour, March. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01540-w.
Read, Stephen J., and Amy Marcus-Newhall. 1993. “Explanatory
Coherence in Social Explanations: A Parallel Distributed Processing
Account.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
65 (3): 429–47. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.429.
Richardson, Emory, and Frank C. Keil. 2022. “Thinking Takes Time:
Children Use Agents’ Response Times to Infer the Source, Quality, and
Complexity of Their Knowledge.” Cognition 224 (July):
105073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105073.
Romeijn, Jan-Willem, and David Atkinson. 2011. “Learning Juror
Competence: A Generalized Condorcet Jury Theorem.” Politics,
Philosophy & Economics 10 (3): 237–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X10372317.
*Roozenbeek, Jon, Rakoen Maertens, Stefan M Herzog, Michael Geers, Ralf
Kurvers, and Mubashir Sultan. 2022. “Susceptibility to
Misinformation Is Consistent Across Question Framings and Response Modes
and Better Explained by Myside Bias and Partisanship Than Analytical
Thinking.” Judgment and Decision Making 17 (3): 27.
Roozenbeek, Jon, Claudia R. Schneider, Sarah Dryhurst, John Kerr,
Alexandra L. J. Freeman, Gabriel Recchia, Anne Marthe van der Bles, and
Sander van der Linden. 2020. “Susceptibility to Misinformation
about COVID-19 Around the World.” Royal Society Open
Science 7 (10): 201199. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201199.
*Rosenzweig, Leah R., Bence Bago, Adam J. Berinsky, and David G. Rand.
2021. “Happiness and Surprise Are Associated with Worse Truth
Discernment of COVID-19 Headlines Among Social Media Users in
Nigeria.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review,
August. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-75.
*Ross, Björn, Jennifer Heisel, Anna-Katharina Jung, and Stefan
Stieglitz. 2018. “Fake News on Social Media: The (In)Effectiveness
of Warning Messages.”
*Ross, Robert M, David G Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2021. “Beyond
“Fake News”: Analytic Thinking and the
Detection of False and Hyperpartisan News Headlines.”
Judgment and Decision Making 16 (2): 22.
Ross Arguedas, A., Sumitra Badrinathan, Camila Mont’Alverne, Benjamin
Toff, Richard Fletcher, and R. Nielsen. 2022. “Snap Judgements:
How Audiences Who Lack Trust in News Navigate Information on Digital
Platforms.”
Rousseau, Denise M., Sim B. Sitkin, Ronald S. Burt, and Colin Camerer.
1998. “Introduction to Special Topic Forum: Not so Different After
All: A Cross-Discipline View of Trust.” The Academy of
Management Review 23 (3): 393–404. http://www.jstor.org/stable/259285.
Rutjens, Bastiaan T., and Bojana Većkalov. 2022. “Conspiracy
Beliefs and Science Rejection.” Current Opinion in
Psychology 46 (August): 101392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101392.
Salmon, Daniel A., Matthew Z. Dudley, Jason M. Glanz, and Saad B. Omer.
2015. “Vaccine Hesitancy: Causes, Consequences, and a Call to
Action.” Vaccine 33: D66–71.
Scharff, Darcell P., Katherine J. Mathews, Pamela Jackson, Jonathan
Hoffsuemmer, Emeobong Martin, and Dorothy Edwards. 2010. “More
Than Tuskegee: Understanding Mistrust about Research
Participation.” Journal of Health Care for the Poor and
Underserved 21 (3): 879–97. https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0323.
Scheufele, Dietram A. 2022. “Thirty Years of
Sciencesociety Interfaces: What’s
Next?” Public Understanding of Science 31 (3): 297–304.
https://doi.org/10.1177/09636625221075947.
Scheufele, Dietram A., and Nicole M. Krause. 2019. “Science
Audiences, Misinformation, and Fake News.” Proceedings of the
National Academy of Sciences 116 (16): 7662–69. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115.
Schulz, Anne, Richard Fletcher, and Marina Popescu. 2020. “Are
News Outlets Viewed in the Same Way by Experts and the Public? A
Comparison Across 23 European Countries.” Reuters Institute
for the Study of Journalism.
Shirikov, Anton. 2024. “Fake News for All: How Citizens Discern
Disinformation in Autocracies.” Political Communication
41 (1): 4565. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2257618.
*Smelter, Thomas J., and Dustin P. Calvillo. 2020. “Pictures and
Repeated Exposure Increase Perceived Accuracy of News Headlines.”
Applied Cognitive Psychology 34 (5): 1061–71. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3684.
Smith, E. Keith, M. Julia Bognar, and Adam P. Mayer. 2024.
“Polarisation of Climate and Environmental Attitudes in the United
States, 1973-2022.” Npj Climate Action 3 (1): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-023-00074-1.
Smith, John Maynard, and David Harper. 2003. Animal Signals.
Oxford University Press.
Smith, Tom W., and Jaesok Son. 2013. “Trends in Public Attitudes
about Confidence in Institutions.” General Social Survey
Final Report.
Soll, Jack B., and Richard P. Larrick. 2009. “Strategies for
Revising Judgment: How (and How Well) People Use Others’
Opinions.” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,
Memory, and Cognition 35 (3): 780–805. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015145.
Song, Hyunjin, David M Markowitz, and Samuel Hardman Taylor. 2022.
“Trusting on the Shoulders of Open Giants? Open Science Increases
Trust in Science for the Public and Academics.” Journal of
Communication 72 (4): 497–510. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac017.
Sperber, Dan, Fabrice Clément, Christophe Heintz, Olivier Mascaro, Hugo
Mercier, Gloria Origgi, and Deirdre Wilson. 2010. “Epistemic
Vigilance.” Mind & Language 25 (4): 359–93.
*Stagnaro, Michael, Sophia Pink, David G. Rand, and Robb Willer. 2023.
“Increasing Accuracy Motivations Using Moral Reframing Does Not
Reduce Republicans’ Belief in False News.”
Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review, November. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-128.
Stagnaro, Michael N., Ben M. Tappin, and David G. Rand. 2023. “No
Association Between Numerical Ability and Politically Motivated
Reasoning in a Large US Probability Sample.” Proceedings of
the National Academy of Sciences 120 (32): e2301491120. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301491120.
Stockemer, Daniel, and Jean-Nicolas Bordeleau. 2024.
“Understanding Climate Change Conspiracy Beliefs: A Comparative
Outlook.” Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review 5
(6). https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-162.
Street, Chris N. H., and Jaume Masip. 2015. “The Source of the
Truth Bias: Heuristic Processing?” Scandinavian Journal of
Psychology 56 (3): 254–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12204.
Strevens, Michael. 2020. The Knowledge Machine: How Irrationality
Created Modern Science. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
Sturgis, Patrick, and Nick Allum. 2004. “Science in Society:
Re-Evaluating the Deficit Model of Public Attitudes.” Public
Understanding of Science 13 (1): 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662504042690.
Sturgis, Patrick, Ian Brunton-Smith, and Jonathan Jackson. 2021.
“Trust in Science, Social Consensus and Vaccine
Confidence.” Nature Human Behaviour 5 (11): 1528–34. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-021-01115-7.
*Sultan, Mubashir, Alan N. Tump, Michael Geers, Philipp Lorenz-Spreen,
Stefan M. Herzog, and Ralf H. J. M. Kurvers. 2022. “Time Pressure
Reduces Misinformation Discrimination Ability but Does Not Alter
Response Bias.” Scientific Reports 12 (1): 22416. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-26209-8.
Tappin, Ben M., Gordon Pennycook, and David G. Rand. 2020.
“Bayesian or Biased? Analytic Thinking and Political Belief
Updating.” Cognition 204 (November): 104375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104375.
Ten Hove, Debby, Terrence D. Jorgensen, and L. Andries van der Ark.
2024. “Updated guidelines on selecting an intraclass correlation
coefficient for interrater reliability, with applications to incomplete
observational designs.” Psychological Methods 29 (5):
967–79. https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000516.
Trouche, Emmanuel, Petter Johansson, Lars Hall, and Hugo Mercier. 2018.
“Vigilant Conservatism in Evaluating Communicated
Information.” Edited by Alexander N. Sokolov. PLOS ONE
13 (1): e0188825. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188825.
Ulusoy, Ezgi, Dustin Carnahan, Daniel E. Bergan, Rachel C. Barry, Siyuan
Ma, Suhwoo Ahn, and Johnny McGraw. 2021. “Flooding the Zone: How
Exposure to Implausible Statements Shapes Subsequent Belief
Judgments.” International Journal of Public Opinion
Research 33 (4): 856–72.
Uscinski, Joseph, Adam Enders, Casey Klofstad, Michelle Seelig, Hugo
Drochon, Kamal Premaratne, and Manohar Murthi. 2022. “Have Beliefs
in Conspiracy Theories Increased over Time?” PLoS ONE 17
(7): e0270429. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0270429.
Van Duyn, Emily, and Jessica Collier. 2019. “Priming and Fake
News: The Effects of Elite Discourse on Evaluations of News
Media.” Mass Communication and Society 22 (1): 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2018.1511807.
Van Stekelenburg, Aart, Gabi Schaap, Harm Veling, Jonathan Van ’T Riet,
and Moniek Buijzen. 2022. “Scientific-Consensus Communication
About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis.”
Psychological Science 33 (12): 1989–2008. https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976221083219.
Većkalov, Bojana, Sandra J. Geiger, František Bartoš, Mathew P. White,
Bastiaan T. Rutjens, Frenk van Harreveld, Federica Stablum, et al. 2024.
“A 27-Country Test of Communicating the Scientific Consensus on
Climate Change.” Nature Human Behaviour, August, 1–14.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-024-01928-2.
Viechtbauer, Wolfgang. 2010. “Conducting Meta-Analyses in
r with the Metafor Package.”
Journal of Statistical Software 36 (3). https://doi.org/10.18637/jss.v036.i03.
Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. “The Spread of
True and False News Online.” Science 359 (6380):
1146–51. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559.
Vranic, Andrea, Ivana Hromatko, and Mirjana Tonković. 2022.
““I Did My Own Research”:
Overconfidence, (Dis)trust in Science, and Endorsement of Conspiracy
Theories.” Frontiers in Psychology 13 (July). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931865.
Weingart, Peter, and Lars Guenther. 2016. “Science Communication
and the Issue of Trust.” Journal of Science
Communication 15 (05): C01. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.15050301.
Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, Asheley R. Landrum, Jesse Hamilton, and
Michael Weisberg. 2021. “Knowledge about the Nature of Science
Increases Public Acceptance of Science Regardless of Identity
Factors.” Public Understanding of Science 30 (2):
120–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520977700.
Wellcome Global Monitor. 2018. “Wellcome Global Monitor
2018.” https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor/2018.
———. 2020. “Wellcome Global Monitor 2020: Covid-19.” https://wellcome.org/reports/wellcome-global-monitor-covid-19/2020.
———. 2021. “Public Trust in Scientists Rose During the Covid-19
Pandemic | News.” https://wellcome.org/news/public-trust-scientists-rose-during-covid-19-pandemic.
Wickham, Hadley, Mara Averick, Jennifer Bryan, Winston Chang, Lucy
D’Agostino McGowan, Romain François, Garrett Grolemund, et al. 2019.
“Welcome to the Tidyverse.” Journal of Open Source
Software 4 (43): 1686. https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.01686.
Wilholt, Torsten. 2013. “Epistemic Trust in Science.”
The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 64 (2):
233–53. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/axs007.
*Winter, Stephan, Sebastián Valenzuela, Marcelo Luis Barbosa Santos,
Tobias Schreyer, Lena Iwertowski, and Tobias Rothmund. n.d.
“(Don’t) Stop Believing: A Signal Detection Approach
to Risk and Protective Factors for Engagement with Politicized
(Mis)information in Social Media.” https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/84c36.
Wintterlin, Florian, Friederike Hendriks, Niels G. Mede, Rainer Bromme,
Julia Metag, and Mike S. Schäfer. 2022. “Predicting Public Trust
in Science: The Role of Basic Orientations Toward Science, Perceived
Trustworthiness of Scientists, and Experiences with Science.”
Frontiers in Communication 6 (January). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.822757.
Xie, Belinda, and Brett Hayes. 2022. “Sensitivity to Evidential
Dependencies in Judgments Under Uncertainty.” Cognitive
Science 46 (5). https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13144.
Yaniv, Ilan. 1997. “Weighting and Trimming: Heuristics for
Aggregating Judgments Under Uncertainty,” 13.
———. 2004. “Receiving Other People’s Advice:
Influence and Benefit.” Organizational Behavior and Human
Decision Processes 93 (1): 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.08.002.
Yaniv, Ilan, Shoham Choshen-Hillel, and Maxim Milyavsky. 2009.
“Spurious Consensus and Opinion Revision: Why Might People Be More
Confident in Their Less Accurate Judgments?” Journal of
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 35 (2):
558–63. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014589.
Yaniv, Ilan, and Eli Kleinberger. 2000. “Advice Taking in Decision
Making: Egocentric Discounting and Reputation Formation.”
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 83 (2):
260–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2909.
Yin, Jun, Zikai Xu, Jing Lin, Wenying Zhou, and Xiuyan Guo. 2024.
“Smartly Following Others: Majority Influence Depends on How the
Majority Behavior Is Formed.” Journal of Experimental Social
Psychology 115 (November): 104644. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2024.104644.
Yousif, Sami R., Rosie Aboody, and Frank C. Keil. 2019. “The
Illusion of Consensus: A Failure to Distinguish Between True and False
Consensus.” Psychological Science 30 (8): 1195–1204. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797619856844.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
Cambridge university press.